Of course, you should stand up for your rights. But to what extent? To avenge is to take action in hopes of gaining justice. But retaliation is to respond in kind, often negatively and quickly.

Moab was a neighboring nation to Israel. They’ve been enemies and Israel faced the brunt of their attacks in various ways. Although Israel tried to defend their borders and to maintain peace, Moab wouldn’t back off. Thus it was settled that this issue cannot be resolved – at least by Israel’s attempts.

But in Isaiah 15, the prophecy concerning Moab begins with the phrase “The burden against Moab.” Prominent cities of Moab are listed with graphic and poetic portrayals of destruction. It is as if God “opened” the gates of the nation for their enemies to enter and to destroy. The 7th verse presents a chilling proclamation:
“Therefore the abundance they have gained and what they have laid up, they will carry away to the Brook of the Willows” (Isaiah 15:7).

Israel did their best to stand up for themselves amidst the constant barrage of attacks and taunts from Moab. But their efforts didn’t have much long term benefit. That’s when God stepped in and brought judgment on the Moabites.

So yes, you should stand up for yourself. But when it seems your efforts are fruitless, there’s no need to worry. Stay humble before God, and patient in “suffering.” Although you feel you’ve been wronged. Know that ultimately God is in control. Not you nor your enemies.

Instead of retaliating or trying to avenge yourself to maintain your honor, let God do his work. He is faithful. And he does everything well.
…
To receive new posts by email, click here.

To book a counseling session with a licensed psychologist, click here.

The story of the talents is often misunderstood. In our modern times we refer to talents as abilities in music, arts, sports, etc. But the ancient use of the word talent was a unit of measure, specifically for weight. Thus, when that master gave “talents” to his servants, he was giving gold, silver, or other costly metals. Those metals were the currency of that time.

So the master entrusted his servants with his wealth and expected them to use it in various businesses to gain more wealth. From the story we see that the servants who received five and two talents doubled the master’s wealth. We can assume that this was the master’s expectation, that his wealth should be doubled by their efforts.

The man with only one talent obviously had less than others, but his mind was trapped with a misunderstanding regarding his master. He felt his master was a thief because of the great wealth that he amassed. This servant could not imagine earning that much money with less effort. He obviously misunderstood wealth because he could not look beyond his own circumstances. It is possible that his master had attempted to educate and train him in business to become successful like his coworkers. But he just could not overcome his obstacles. 

But this man had the option of building with the little given to him, thus earning a greater responsibility or “talents” of wealth.
But he couldn’t get past his obstacles. The obstacle of having less than others possibly caused him to think that the master did not trust him. As his master may have tried to teach and train him, he would have understood that this servant just could not grasp the concept of business and wealth building. This may be the reason for the master giving less to him compared to his colleagues. This might have been an act of mercy just to give him the benefit of the doubt.

The second obstacle was that he misunderstood wealth. He saw his master’s task as improper and dishonest. If he did not have these obstacles limiting his mindset, he would have been able to take the one talent and make it two. Thus prompting the master to entrust him with more.

I remember speaking with a young man about wealth building concepts. His first response was “one man’s gain is another man’s loss.” This mindset trapped him, and blocked him from future possibilities of wealth building. The servant with one talent had his own mental limitations.

The master may have given him more opportunities, but who knows? The man’s rash response and comments regarding the master possibly caused him to call the man “worthless servant” and cast him out of his presence.

The less talented and those who have less also have an opportunity. They surely need to get over the mental obstacles.
… 

** To receive new posts by email, click here.
** To book a counseling session with a licensed Christian psychologist, click here.

It’s simple and complicated at the same time. In my earliest years, it was the Good News Bible for regular reading, and the KJV was my “church” bible. Later, in 1983 I tried the NIV for one week, and was hooked. Although I’ve used multiple translations, the NIV remained my primary bible.

Then, when the 2011 update to the NIV presented some significant updates, my view changed – after decades. I felt the new NIV went too far beyond being a translation. It almost became a commentary. What I mean is that it was trying to help the readers too much. 

There were cumbersome readings such as “brothers and sisters” where the original simply said “brothers”. Of course, it was intended for men and women, but I believe that the modern reader can understand and appreciate that this is an ancient text and the writing of the ancients would keep the pattern of their time. This is just one example. There are many others as well.

Then about 2015, I moved on to the ESV. This proved to be a good evangelical “update” to the RSV, and I felt comfortable with that. The ESV didn’t try to help, rather it kept much of the original forms.

I’ve been handling biblical languages for over 35 years, and I know that the original pattern and order cannot remain. But going to the far extent where the text reads like a modern novel was not my idea of the Bible (I understand there is a place for this, but it’s not for me).

Then there was the shift to the NKJV which removed much of the archaic renderings of the KJV. My main reason for this shift came as a result of the perspective of removing verses from the New Testament when none of the oldest available manuscripts contain them. I understand the technical reasoning for this, but I feel this is unwarranted. We don’t have ALL the ancient texts. Even if it was an addition, it aligns with the theme of the passage and presents no theological difficulties.

Once you begin removing verses for one reason, we surely can find more reasons for future removals. I’d rather not. Along with this idea is the concept of the hundreds of church traditions that have brought the text to us. Although I don’t hold the church traditions above scripture, I value its witness. Who knows, it may be a witness to ancient texts that had those verses “in question” for the textual critics.

I continue to use the ESV for academic purposes and for the classes that I teach. But my personal Bible reading has shifted to the NKJV.

These are my personal reasons to switch to the NKJV. What do you think?

… 

*** To receive new posts by email, click here.
*** To book a counseling session with a licensed Christian psychologist, click here.

Years of conditioning through experiences get us into a rut. The rut gets comfortable. It becomes familiar. Our focus gets narrower. We don’t look elsewhere. It’s no use. We’re stuck in a rut. 

For some, it becomes part of their personality. For some, it defines identity. It’s hard to know how many, but for some, it becomes bondage. 

How does one get out? That’s difficult. It took years to get into this, and may take years to get out. But once the person is conscious about their situation that is the first step out. Then they must have the desire to get out. Unfortunately, I’ve dealt with many who’d rather remain. 

Maybe it’s comfortable being uncomfortable. Maybe the pain of change is greater than the pain of remaining in the rut. 

But once the desire is there, with prayer, encouragement, and counseling, there is hope. I’ve seen people who remain, and those who get out. What a relief when they get out. It’s a relief for those who help them, and a new life for those who get out. 

Don’t give up on people who are stuck in a rut. 

… 

*** To receive new posts by email, click here.
*** To book a counseling session with a licensed Christian psychologist, click here.

“What we believe has divided us, but who we believe in will unite us.”*

Beliefs are internalized as convictions. Convictions run deep, and get attached to the person’s identity. Could identity be the cause of divisions?

But the relationship with Christ is common for those with various convictions stemming from differing beliefs.

So, it’s unity in relationship and diversity in belief?

* (I heard this quote from Satish Kumar, pastor of Calvary Temple, Hyderabad. Quote originally attributed to Billy Graham).

…

*** To receive new posts by email, click here.
*** To book a counseling session with a licensed Christian psychologist, click here.

What an amazing paradox.
The title (Hebrew YHWH Sabaoth) shows God as the “Commander of the armies of heaven” – he is the divine warrior, majestic, powerful, sovereign over all cosmic forces. This title is common in the prophets.
Yet in the same prophecy, YHWH is referred to as the “Servant” (Isaiah 52–53).

This Servant is:
Despised and rejected
A man of sorrows
Wounded for others
Led like a lamb to the slaughter
Observe the paradox:
God of Hosts: He has power, armies, victory, and cosmic authority.

Suffering Servant: weakness, humiliation, suffering, sacrifice
We commonly understand that victory comes through strength. But in the suffering servant, God accomplishes his task through suffering. But the Lord of Hosts is not without power. He put his power aside and came down to earth as Jesus Christ, the suffering servant. 

In Christ, God presents himself meek and lowly while possessing all power and authority.
… 

*** To receive new posts by email, click here.
*** To book a counseling session with a licensed Christian psychologist, click here.

When we point a finger, there are three fingers pointing back at us.

That’s scary.

But we’re never afraid. It feels good to point fingers. It makes us feel validated. Vindicated.

After all, they’re wrong. (And that may be accurate).

Then I observe three fingers pointing at me and remember the words of Jesus.

“So when they continued asking Him, He raised Himself up and said to them, ‘He who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first.’”
— John 8:7 (NKJV)

But why do I keep pointing fingers?

… 

*** To receive new posts by email, click here.
*** To book a counseling session with a licensed Christian psychologist, click here.

The teachings of Jesus and all the miracles that he performed were carefully tailored to present the Kingdom of God to Jews and non-Jews alike.

This is what Jesus said about his parables:
“To what shall we liken the kingdom of God? Or with what parable shall we picture it?” — Mark 4:30 (NKJV)

Here is what he said about his miracles, especially when he cast demons out:
“But if I cast out demons by the Spirit of God, surely the kingdom of God has come upon you.”
— Matthew 12:28 (NKJV)

There was no coercion. There was no pressure. Jesus had no quota to fulfill. Although he was compassionate toward all those who suffered, He was focused in his approach. He gave a clear and compelling invitation to the Kingdom.

Take it or leave it.
…

To receive new posts by email, click here.

To book a counseling session with a licensed psychologist, click here.

In the parable of the talents, the man who received only one talent identified his master as a thief. And he was not afraid to say it to his face. He was that sure of his assessment. Take that.

“Then he who had received the one talent came and said, ‘Lord, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you have not sown, and gathering where you have not scattered seed.’ ” (Matthew 25:24)

According to his own assessment, his master’s wealth was unreasonable. His wealth was built on something other than physical work that this servant was used to. As a matter of fact, that’s all the wealth building knowledge that he has. According to that, his boss was certainly a crook. How else would he continue to amass such wealth? The master surely doesn’t work as hard as this servant does.

The servant’s limited understanding and experience caused him to conclude that his master was a thief. And he was convinced enough that he called him out – possibly before the others.

The servant had no understanding of assets and how assets could be leveraged to continuously build wealth and earn an income.
…

Subscribe to receive new posts by email.

When someone has benefited from a system, relationship, or belief for a long time, leaving it can create complications. There’s that uncomfortable feeling of admitting “I was wrong,” or “I stayed for years in something I now reject.”

Because of that, people sometimes construct another “reason” for leaving that protects their self-image. And maybe they’ll protect their conscience too. 

What’s the reason behind the reason? That’s what’s being hidden. Maybe it’s good not to know. Let it rest. 

…